Does using a major cloud provider make us secure?
A provider supplies important controls, but the service model determines the responsibility boundary. Your access decisions, tenant settings, data handling and operating procedures still need review.
Can you review infrastructure and software subscriptions?
We can discuss both within an agreed scope. Start by identifying the platforms, critical services and business questions you need answered so the right expertise and access can be arranged.
Will the review change production settings?
Assessment and implementation are separate activities unless explicitly agreed. Changes should have an authorized owner, an impact assessment and a rollback plan.
Is a configuration review a penetration test?
No. A configuration review examines settings, access and evidence. A penetration test is a separately scoped and authorized activity with different objectives and methods.
How do you work with our existing IT provider?
Define responsibilities and evidence access at the start. Findings should identify who makes the decision and who carries out the change, so work complements the existing operating model.
Do we have to replace our current tools?
The starting point is what your environment needs and what your existing tools can support. A gap may be a configuration, process or ownership issue rather than a product requirement.
What should we prepare for the first conversation?
Bring a high-level list of cloud platforms, critical business services, known concerns and the people responsible. Do not send credentials or sensitive exports through the website form.
How often should cloud security be reviewed?
Use a cadence appropriate to risk, with additional reviews after significant migrations, new integrations, privilege changes or incidents. Rapidly changing environments need ongoing ownership, not a one-time report.